Wednesday 28 December 2016

Why we must talk about suicide





It's the last taboo. It really is. You can talk about your job, your relationship, your piles, or even your periods (we're getting a bit better at this one – at least in the West), but if you express so much as a whiff of a suggestion that you might be struggling to find many, if any, cogent reasons to remain on earth, you will be instantly shut down.

"Don't say such things."
"Don't do anything silly."
"Don't even think about it."
"Don't be so dramatic."
"Think of your family."
"It's not that bad."

With regard to the last one, the bald truth is that if a person is actually contemplating offing themselves, then it definitely IS that bad, and frankly, no matter how uncomfortable it may be for anyone else to hear, such persons really do need to be allowed to talk about it.

I once had the privilege of working as PA to a Chartered Psychologist. She was about five feet nothing, and worked with addicts - mainly on narcotics. I frankly feared for her safety sometimes, and would often stay late to make sure there was someone else around when she took her last appointments of the day at around 7pm. I was ready to use my rusty Shaolin Kung-fu skills, or at least my 999 dialling finger, if anything got out of hand. It never did. Most of her patients, even the ones who carried razor blades to slash themselves, were just people in immense mental pain.

My boss mainly dealt with serious addiction, but plenty of her patients were simply exhibiting depression and anxiety, and were 'at risk' of suicide – or they had at least admitted to their GP that they did not wish to carry on living. I had the opportunity to chat a little with some of her patients before they were called into the office. Most just sat quietly, leafing through the magazines on offer in the cosy waiting room, but some would stop to chat to me.

Most were embarrassed, and would tell me that I must think their problems very silly (most were immensely wealthy), but I would always parrot my boss and say that what I thought about it was not as important as what they thought about it, and if their issues were making them feel like doing away with themselves, then there was nothing silly about any of it.

In fact, far from being silly, or an emotion that we must all quickly sweep up and tip into the negativity sin bin, I would actually suggest that every last one of us has had moments in our lives where we no longer wished to go on.

With something this important, we must listen. Yet we're discouraged from any kind of negative thought under a barrage of daily inspirational sayings on social media. Cod philosophy is set to pictures of sunrises and idyllic beaches telling us that if we don't live in a state of perpetual gratitude for the gift of life, we are bad people in need of correction.

I find myself wondering: why are we allowed to express only positivity? Isn't that against the laws of nature? For every positive, there is a negative, for every up there is a down, and for every high there is a low. Are they not all part of the overall picture?

Besides fear of censure for the crime of negativity, other popular reasons for keeping any feelings of hopelessness to yourself include:

Making other people feel uncomfortable
Making other people question their own existence
Making other people feel they ought to be able to help you (Part 1)
Making other people angry with you because feel they ought to be able to help you (Part 2)
Making God angry because He bestowed the 'gift' of life upon you

Of course, that last one is a few thousand years of religion poking its nose into human affairs. It does that a lot. The others are all about other people, and not the person in distress.

Life can be exceptionally hard for some people, and a walk in the park for others. No two people's life experience is the same, that's why it would appear to make sense not to generalise on anyone else's situation and their attitude towards it. Money helps, although there are those who constantly and smugly assert that "money can't buy you happiness". This may be true for certain aspects of life, such as the attainment of satisfying and requited human love, but it can certainly buy housing, security, and the occasional treat to take the edge off things, even if the emotional garden isn't all roses. For those living hand to mouth, whose poverty is literally killing them, it really doesn't help to be told this.

Neither does it help to be urged to think of all the things they have going for them. Perhaps they have a gift for entertaining others (Robin Williams springs to mind), or animals like their company, or they're living in a nice part of the world, or they have an enviable figure and are universally admired by both sexes. If a depressed state is preventing them from seeing these as sufficient motivation to keep on breathing, force-feeding them reasons to be cheerful isn't going to change their minds.

Neither will antidepressants – which have a habit of making patients taking them put on weight, which tends to depress people even more. All pills can do is rearrange a few chemicals in the brain to enable a person to keep on doing the things that are making them miserable, only more cheerfully and efficiently.

In some cases, pills can alter outlook sufficiently to enable a person to make changes that may give them more options. They can help to put someone in the right frame of mind to do the housework that may have been building up for months, or email out a few more job applications with a less desperate tone to them. I will not deny there are one or two benefits to be had.

What a suicidal depressive needs more than pills however, is to be able to talk about it. To vocalise their belief that life would be easier if they were no longer obliged to live it, and to express the euphoria and relief they envisage when they imagine that white light moving towards them as they move to the next dimension and leave all the grief and pain behind. Hard as it may be for others to listen to, especially if they are struggling themselves, such thoughts must be permitted to be expressed without fear of rebuke.

Of course, professional psychiatrists are more than equipped to provide such services. However, here again is where the wealthy but unhappy win out over the impoverished. They can pay for people like my old boss to listen to them in a comfortable Chelsea consulting room any time of the day they choose. For the less well off, counselling is only available on the NHS if you're prepared to hang tight and sit on a waiting list for a few months to years, and then only if your work is sufficiently understanding to permit you to attend appointments during the working week - which is why many working depressives never make it to counselling.

The poor do have the wonderful Samaritans service to call upon, and they're only a 'phone call away. However, I maintain that nobody with any serious intent to kill themselves will call them, as they will not wish to be talked out of it. Only those who actually wish to be saved will dial that number. When I voiced this to my GP during a discussion about depression and suicide, he said in some surprise: "that's very rational", to which I replied, "yes, watch out for the rational ones."

And we must. Most suicides tend to come as a complete surprise to families and friends. The funny chum who keeps everyone in stitches, who is always there for everyone else, and who is found hanging in their garage. We must not be surprised. We must be vigilant. There are always signs. More than the occasional reference to the past, and how lovely it all was, romanticised pictures on social media of Ophelia floating down the river covered in flowers but without any accompanying description or context, that sort of thing.

Keep a watchful eye, and bite your tongue when they finally start to speak, because shutting them up with a mealy-mouthed meme or a platitude might just shut them up forever.


© Emmeline Wyndham - 2016









Sunday 20 November 2016

Genteel slobbery



I see the Telegraph has come out with another of those 'lists' that Waitrose shoppers love to complete to affirm their middle-class status and reassure themselves they're 'posh': '16 belongings you will own if you're middle-class'.

Here's one I came up with as an alternative:

35 signs you have class but no money (well, your family may have had money, but some generations ago)…



  1. Your Barbour is over 30 years old
  2. So is your favourite winter coat
  3. You don't have a dishwasher
  4. The crocks in your cupboard are a jumble of 1970s Habitat earthenware, stacked with your grandmother's Wedgwood and Minton dinner plates
  5. You have champagne flutes but they're covered in a thin film of dust
  6. Ditto the set of crystal sherry glasses
  7. Your cookware is over ten years old (your favourite saucepan is probably the one you used at school camp)
  8. You drink your morning tea from a bone-china cup and your coffee out of a KitKat mug that came free with an Easter Egg 10 years ago
  9. You don't have an AGA or a Rayburn, you have an old trooper of a gas cooker
  10. Christmas trifle is made in a large Victorian crystal punch bowl drowning in sherry
  11. You had a Chesterfield sofa at home, but it was ripped to shreds by generations of cats
  12. You know how to write and address letters to peers and other dignitaries without having to consult Debretts Correct Form – but you can't remember how you know…
  13. You know how to curtsey / bow if required, without toppling over, even when drunk
  14. You know how to correctly introduce people of different ranks to each other, but again, you can't remember how you know…
  15. You use correct spelling and grammar - even when texting
  16. You say 'aitch' and not 'haitch' (Irish people are excused)
  17. You drive an aged Ford
  18. You use the back of A5 bits of paper watermarked 'Smythson' with your childhood address printed on the front as scrap / for shopping lists
  19. Ref 18 - the address is die-stamped, not thermo-printed (to look as if it's die-stamped)
  20. You buy your underwear from the local market stall and greet the stall-holder by name
  21. Ditto your nightwear
  22. Most of your woollens have at least one hole or trailing thread
  23. You don't give a toss when people are surprised that you buy your jeans from Tu at Sainsbury's
  24. You scraped an 'O' level in French
  25. You understand basic Latin, and use it occasionally to emphasise a point – then have to explain what you just said…
  26. You fix stuff around the house yourself using the Reader's Digest book of How to do Stuff Around the House, and if you can't fix the problem, you simply avoid the damaged area (particularly applies to rotted floors and stairs)
  27. Your wiring is 'idiosyncratic' but you know how to jiggle the bakerlite switch it to make it work
  28. You know how to climb over a 5-bar gate
  29. You know how to shoot, but you don't shoot
  30. You know how to ride, but you don't own a horse
  31. You don't put on the heating, you just wear more clothes
  32. You have a hot water bottle
  33. You have a very old bottle of gin rubbing shoulders with an ancient bottle of cherry brandy in your drinks cupboard
  34. You don't have a drinks cupboard, you use a shelf in the pantry
  35. You don’t give a flying one what anyone says about you


© Emmeline Wyndham - 2016





Thursday 10 November 2016

Modern 'Motoring' (if you can call it that...)



A manual transmission Ford Fusion - 2007. Also known as 'Caroline'...


Hi. I am a driver. I drive a car. A manual car. I use a hand and foot-operated clutch to change gears to suit the speed at which the vehicle is moving.

I do that. Me. While I watch the road, keeping alert to other road users and everything else going on around me. I also use one of my hands to operate and adjust the angle of the headlamps according to light conditions (and the weight of whatever I may have in the boot), and another to regulate the cabin temperature. I learned how to do all this in my early twenties with the AA Driving School. A year after I qualified for my full driving license, I realised just how little I had actually needed to know to pass my test, and just how much there is to learn about being on the road, especially if you live in a rural area like the New Forest. Now sliding into my mid-fifties, I consider I am still learning.

That said, I clearly needn't have bothered. Cars now switch on their bluey LED string 'driving' lights the minute you flop your bum down behind the steering wheel, sun roofs open and close, doors flap, and in-flight voices smoothly instruct you as to what checks the vehicle is making whilst you get comfy on their soft, heated, Moroccan calfskin seats.

You may as well just step onto a transporter pad. Beam me up, Scotty.

People are getting very, very lazy, as car adverts for vehicles costing more and more get sillier and sillier. I noticed the rot had set in some 12 years ago when I got into a rich mate's babe-magnet low-slung sports thing, and it handed me my seat-belt. A robotic arm crept out and headed towards my chest area as I watched, flattened to the seat, cross-eyed and in mounting panic, before my tweed-clad, laughing chum explained what it was doing and what it wanted. His motor was state of the art at the time.

"Geordie, you utter creep!" I yelled. "Get your car to grope your dates for you now?"

We both laughed, but turns out that was just the beginning. There literally is almost no such thing as 'driving' anymore. Not if you're the owner of one of the 'new generation' of motor vehicles. You just get in, switch it on (or with some of the more advanced models, it seems you just have to fart in its general direction for it to spring into action), and off you go.

The day is rapidly approaching when all you need do is settle your sit-upon in the front seat (that's either front seat depending on your mood), shout out a post-code or OS coordinates, then just sit back listening to music or watching television while the car transports you to your destination.

Every year, with every new generation of motorised vehicle rolling off the assembly line (and of course, built by robots), the gadgets get more 'sophisticated' as the 'comfort' and 'convenience'' of the customer provide designers with ever more 'challenges'. If I thought it was pathetic when cars started beeping at you to aid your reverse-parking, they now even brake for you using 'sensors'.

As if actual kinetics were not enough, we now have standard 'enhanced visibility' in the form of automatically activated over bright headlamps. With no legislation yet to bring them to heel, these sharply angled, angry-looking halogen headlamps, activated by the ignition of the engine, blaze in your face on sunny days, and blind you at night as they beam hundreds of yards ahead even supposedly on 'dipped'. Apparently, it's become important for drivers to be able to see several hundred miles ahead of them down the road. Other road users coming in the opposite direction need to invest in orange, anti-glare Ski-glasses to avoid going off the road, and yet car manufacturers actually dare to boast about the 'reach' of these anti-personnel standard Glare Mout Dazzlers they mount on the mean 'faces' of their vehicle designs.

…and that's another thing I've noticed: cars have got more aggressive looking. I remember when Vauxhall decided to give their Corsa a round bum to 'appeal' to women (because everyone knows human females get scared and panicky if household and other items don't somehow ape their arses in design), but this 'soft' approach has given way to a trend that sees domestic motor vehicles now all looking like Anton Furst's Batmobile 'eating up the tarmac' like Satan on wheels, and 'challenging' all in their path …to Waitrose or B&Q on a Saturday afternoon.

"Grrrr...." The Lexus LX - 2016

Gone are the round, friendly, chrome mounted headlamps of my youth with their happy looking  grills. Now, vicious predators roar up your arse on country lanes. You look up into your rear view mirror to see Abaddon the Despoiler with its headlamps deliberately designed to look like eyes with what I am reliably informed is actually termed 'aggressive styling' burrowing up your bumper trying to force you to break the speed limit to get away from them, or pull over to let them pass on their urgent way.

"Purrr...." An Austin Healey 3000 - 1962
No wonder there are so many more accidents than I remember from my early driving days. Not only are these new disagreeable looking cars incredibly distracting if they pull up behind you, their drivers just don't need to pay as much attention to the road - or to anyone else using it - as once they had to. Or at least they don't think they do.

Every time I leave my house, I wonder if I will come back in one piece, or if some overpaid numpty in a Chelsea Tractor which probably takes their kids to school by itself, does the laundry, and picks up the dry-cleaning by remote control, will plough into me - while its owner is checking off their shopping list in the passenger seat…

Because that's all 'state of the art' modern cars will seemingly permit their owners to be: passengers. They're not drivers. Not by my definition anyway.

Whenever I see someone coming towards me in a bashed old Ford or a mud-spattered Land Rover, I feel like high-fiving them.

Well done, Ma'am.

HMQ in her beloved 1987 Land Rover



© Emmeline Wyndham – November 2016

Monday 18 July 2016

My Friend 'Noodles': Yiannoulla Yianni



Yiannoulla 'Lucy' Yianni - 1965 -1982





I wish I could remember the name of our beleaguered Biology teacher - mine and Yiannoulla Yianni's. We did tease him pretty badly, but we thought it was a bit rich him not bothering to mark our homework, then giving us a load of grief because we laughed at his striped pullovers and baggy trousers.

I remember Yiannoulla a lot more clearly than I remember him. Her family called her Lucy. Her mates called her 'Noodles'. We were in the same year, and shared a few subjects together. We weren't in the same registration class, but she was my mate for Biology, and sitting with her made it a lot more fun. She was a lot of fun. I can hear her voice and her laugh in my head to this day - 34 years later. She was dry, and witty, with a superb humour and deadpan delivery.

She always dressed smartly too. I remember the little jacket she used to wear with her neat straight skirts, pastel sweaters, and court shoes. She used to wear combs in her hair, trying to tame it, and would wear it up on one side, always with something pretty holding it in place.

And she was Greek. Proper Greek. Serious Greek. Not just a smidgeon like me. She was a north London Greek Cypriot girl, with all the traditional background and home life that comes with it. No messing. She had family around her – including a protective father and brothers, and you couldn't imagine anyone trying anything on with her or her sister with them around.

I remember every detail of her face, how her eyes twinkled when she smiled, and she smiled a lot. She had what most would call a "sunny disposition".

We were all on summer break when my mother called me into the kitchen and directed my attention to the local paper. "Isn't she a friend of yours?" She asked, pointing to a picture.

I looked over her shoulder. It was a picture of Yiannoulla.

"Yes, that's 'Noodles'," I smiled. "Why, what's she done?"

But it wasn't what she had done that was the focus of the piece and the reason her picture was in the paper.

It was what had been done to her.

Words leaped out from the page as I read.

'Strangled'
'Sexually assaulted'
'Teenager'

"But maybe she's ok", I read on frantically, "- maybe she's just in hospital…"

'Dead'

Her parents had come home to find the place in chaos, and their daughter stripped and lifeless on a bed.

Not surprising. The chaos, I mean. Nobody would have got the better of Yiannoulla if she said 'no'. She was a Quintin girl. She would have fought with everything she had. She wouldn't have gone quietly.

The Police tried to piece things together, but her agonised parents had gone berserk, smashing things up in the house, making forensics harder to gather.

They did their best. Every boy and every teacher at school was pulled in for finger-printing. There had been no sign of forced entry, you see, and as Yiannoulla wouldn't have let anyone in the house she didn't know, they reckoned it had to be someone from the local community.

A cabbie reported he'd picked up a fare in Belsize Road that day who'd been acting suspiciously. A man. Sweating and agitated. He told the Police where he'd picked the guy up and where he'd dropped him off, but they couldn't find him.

Yiannoulla's family had a shoe repair business in West Hampstead, and my mother and I would often see her dad standing outside laughing and joking around as we went to the mini-mart in the same street.

As the funeral came and went, and months dragged by with no leads, her father found a few £thousand for a reward for any information. It would have been just about all he had. Next time we saw him, standing in the doorway of his shop, he was a changed man. Thin, pale, haunted. His eyes were hollow, and his smile was completely gone.

Months turned into years, and years turned into decades. The Police had interviewed over 1000 possible 'witnesses', but all came to nothing. Then in January 2016, a man was arrested for an unrelated offence, and his DNA was found to be a match for material found at Yiannoulla's murder scene.

Not to put too fine a point on it, that 'material' was semen. When it came to his trial in July of this year for the brutal rape and murder of my friend, the 'suspect', James Warnock, tried to claim that he had been in a "secret, consensual sexual relationship" with her.

But his memory failed him. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, working class girls in their mid-teens, even if they were not modestly brought up Greek girls like Noodles, just didn't sleep around. They read 'Jackie' magazine (where just snogging someone meant they were your boyfriend), and quaked at the thought of "going all the way" with a boy for fear of pregnancy. GPs could still inform your parents if you asked for the Pill, and if it got out that you'd "done it", you faced being labelled a 'slag'. Indeed, what George Bernard Shaw's Professor Higgins referred to as 'slum prudery' was very much the norm among the girls of Quintin Kynaston School. It wasn't so much that girls were saving themselves for marriage, but there was still definitely the expectation that if you got pregnant, you would have to get married. So, if you didn't want to get married, you didn't play Russian Roulette with the possibility of getting pregnant.

In this age of Rihanna, Beyonce, twerking, Miley Cyrus's ever-lolling tongue, ladettes, 13-year-old mothers, and Robin Thicke's 'Blurred Lines', such attitudes must seem like a distant fairy tale. James Warnock was clearly counting on it when he tried to besmirch Yiannoulla's reputation in Court 6 of the Old Bailey. Perhaps he had genuinely forgotten the culture of the time, but he made a grave mistake expecting everyone else to have forgotten too.

Thankfully, the Jury didn't buy it. Not least, one assumes, because the Post Mortem results read out in court revealed that before Warnock decided to knock on her door, barge in, and help himself to her, Yiannoulla had been a virgin. Indeed, as it emerged that she had been chased around her home, and had tried to lock herself in her brother's room to evade his brutal attack (which included partial drowning, and mutilation of her genitals, the court - and her family - heard), the fable of a 'consensual sexual relationship' was revealed to be just that – a fantasy, cooked up by a cold-blooded, cold-hearted psychopath, who thought he'd got away with it, and got sloppy, leaving his forensic footprint all over another dodgy scene, and, as an added bonus, failed to clear his computer cache of kiddie porn as well.

Nick, nick.

When I read the news on Friday that he'd been found guilty, I admit I collapsed. My legs just gave way, and I burst into hysterical tears, right there in my office.

I wasn't expecting that. Neither were my colleagues. The brain is a funny thing. Like many of Yiannoulla's friends, I had given up hope long ago that she would ever get justice. I had thought that whoever it was had just got away with it. That it would be an unsolved crime forever.

I had to go for a walk around town. All the while I was walking, I was saying to myself: "they got him… My God... they actually got him…" as if saying it over and over would make me finally believe it.

Today, he was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 25 years. The judge apparently told him he would "die in prison", whilst he stood impassively in front of Noodles' traumatised family and friends. Truthfully, I felt it would have been better justice, if only poetic justice, if that minimum had been 34 years - one for every year her family suffered not knowing who had murdered their girl, or why. At least now they know who. As to why, though...Seems he just he felt like it. Certainly it appears he's demonstrated not a second of remorse.

I realised something as the tears of relief rolled down my face last week, hearing that he'd been found guilty. All these years, I have felt strangely guilty too: guilty that I got to grow up - and grow old - and she didn't.

I remember I looked up at the blue sky, and smiled. "You can rest now, Babe…" I said.

Although her poor father died a little while ago, hopefully now, Yiannoulla's mother, brothers and sister will finally be able to get some rest too.

© Emmeline Wyndham – 18 July 2016